Do recruiters treat you with disrespect?

by Sharon Graham. Filed under: $100k+ Job Seekers, Ethics and Integrity.
vaso link

Invisible

If you are a jobseeker in today’s market, you have probably experienced the “Rude Recruiter” phenomenon. It seems that some recruiters treat job seekers as if they are nothing more than small, insignificant fish in a sea of candidates.

Working with six-figure professionals every day, I have heard horror stories from many highly marketable candidates who are treated poorly by recruiters. Here is how the story generally goes:

You are a diligent six-figure job seeker and you spend much of each working day carefully researching recruiters and submitting a professional resume only to suitable recruiters. You wait an appropriate time to get a response. None comes – not even a simple acknowledgement of receipt. Then, being proactive, you pick up the phone, call the recruiter, and leave a message, which seems to end up in some sort of “Black Hole.” Being a most persistent professional, you call again and finally reach a person who responds with a curt “If you sent your resume, we have your resume. We’ll get back to you when there is an opportunity.” CLICK. When a recruiter finally takes notice and calls you in, you are left waiting for an inordinate amount of time in the lobby. What you may find is that after you complete a great interview, send a strong note of thanks, and follow up with a message to express your interest, you never hear back at all – not even the courtesy of letting you know that someone else was selected.

Let’s face it – job search is like a wild ride on a roller coaster. I cannot even imagine how deflating these “ups and downs” must be for a person who has spent their life building a noteworthy career and gaining respect from colleagues, suppliers, clients, and previous employers.

I must acknowledge that there are good recruiters and good recruitment firms out there. But, I have heard far too many six-figure job seekers saying that it seems that recruiters have lost their manners. They rarely respond to applications received and often treat candidates with disrespect. I wonder if many of these same recruiters have forgotten what it felt like when they were looking for a job. I also wonder if they realize that the applicant they treat badly today will become valuable to them as a potential client or perfect candidate tomorrow. And, what will that person think of them after the way they were treated by the recruiter?

To be fair, we must also understand that the world has been changing at a tremendous pace. Organizations are charged to do more with less. Recruiters being bombarded with hundreds (and yes, even thousands) of resumes for one position. Internet correspondence is often impersonal. And, realistically, recruiters are not paid by applicants they are paid by companies to find the best candidate for the job, so they really don’t have any allegiance to the applicant at all. This certainly does not excuse rudeness, but it does explain why things are the way they seem to be today.

Let’s be realistic. Recruiters are results driven. If they don’t want to put you forward for the role, there has to be a reason:

  • They do not have an appropriate job for you at this time.
  • They have other candidates who seem to be more qualified than you.
  • Something in your resume, conversation, or background turned them off.
  • Your level or salary expectation is not a match for the positions they fill.

Now, rather than focusing on the negative, let’s talk about what six-figure candidates can do to get noticed and taken seriously. If the world has changed, then we need to change with it. Applying to a position on the Internet will not get you the kind of connection or relationship that a $100k+ professional needs.

Realistically, I don’t think that recruiters take a “first come, first served” approach. I think that most do their due diligence. Remember, if you are competing against hundreds of potentially qualified candidates, your chances of getting called are pretty slim.

The six-figure people who generally get in are the ones who are well-networked, well-presented, well-known, and well-matched to the position. In other words, you’ll have the best chance of getting a call-back and getting treated with respect if YOU have done your due diligence:

  • You need to be presenting one of the most powerful resume out of all the resumes they receive.
  • You need to have already made a strong internal contact (a corporate decision maker)
  • You need to have a highly visible, powerful online presence that the recruiter will find and LOVE when they do their due diligence.
  • You need to do all your homework to investigate the company’s underlying needs and use your resume and supplementary material to show them exactly what you can do to help them.

No matter how you are treated, it is best to “take the high road.” Treat all recruiters with as much respect as you would have wanted to receive yourself. Swallow your pride and find a way to create a bond where none exists. If the recruiter sees you as a valuable connection, you will find that the relationship will quickly turn positive.

If you are targeting a six-figure opportunity that is a good fit, a better way to getting your foot in the door would be to make connections within the company. If there is a job posting, don’t bypass the recruiter, but if you have already made other “inroads” with key decision makers in the company, then let them know that you are interested. Surely, that person will inform the recruiter to bring you forward during the selection process.

Here’s wishing you ethics, integrity, and lots of return calls during your job search!

This post was inspired by a recent comment from Steve R. Did a recruiter recently treat you with disrespect? How did you handle it? If you would like to tell me your horror story, ask a question, state your opinion, or give further advice, please do comment.

Thank you for reading my blog! Please email me if you spot any errors in this post.

3 Responses to Do recruiters treat you with disrespect?

  1. Professional CV

    Great post Sharon – I wish more job seekers would listen to this good and strong advice.

    As the director of a recruitment company which also offers CV services in the UK, the key point you make here is in these two points:
    # They have other candidates who seem to be more qualified than you.
    # Something in your resume, conversation, or background turned them off.

    Whether it is recruiting for a £10k or £100k post, the same sifting process takes place: does the job applicant have the right combination of skills, qualifications and experiences to fulfil the basic functions of the job? Many of us use junior members of staff to check this, as it is a good point to learn the variation of skills on the market, and get a feel for what matches a clients needs. I always say simply, if you can’t find the skills directly on your CV/resume, then don’t apply. Often, I suggest to candidates that they use a highlighter pen to achieve this if in doubt.

    The issue of turn-off is greatly closed out/managed by your set of points with regards to homework, research and networking. I often say to CV clients – yes, even as a recruiter – that they should apply to employer listed jobs over recruiter listed jobs. We always apply higher standards to job applicants, as when we put them forward they not only represent themselves, but also our future engagements with that employer client.

    However, many £100k+ posts are advertised by recruiters/headhunters, as employers want their brand isolated/protected when hiring for such positions. I hence suggest to job applicants that they should act like a high class lady when reviewing such posts as a potential opportunity:
    1. call first before applying, never over the internet
    2. make it obvious you are interested but need persuading to apply: desperation = unemployment!
    3. be as clear about what you want, as much as what they they need – have a check list
    4. accept you won’t on first engagement get the name of the company, but check where the recruiter is engaged with the company: board or below, HR only? Where/when in the process would you meet the company?
    5. Stipulate to meet the recruiter before your CV is forwarded to their client.

    The problem many have who are returning to the job market at the moment, is the apparent riches offered by “Click to Apply.” But the same old rules of people employ people have never been more true, and hence need to be applied. Good Luck!

    Best Regards, Ian R McAllister

  2. Ljuba

    This post is sadly all to true and very discouraging for job seekers but also clients who are starting to realize in droves that the recruitment process is often a candidate’s first live touch point with the organization. The impression that is made on candidates today not only reflects upon the recruiters reputation but now is also having greater affect on the hiring company’s reputation as well. In many circumstances, that first impression and the impressions that follow through out the process will lay the foundations for long term employment and ultimately retention down the road.

    Candidate care is very quickly becoming the next evolution of recruitment, in particular as it relates to RPOs or Corporate Recruitment. With strong candidate care practices, companies are able to sustain relationships with candidates building their talent network and allowing them to recruit more efficiently in the future. While tools and automations have helped recruiters quickly assess candidates and provide them with almost instant feedback, they have actually dehumanized the recruitment process. As companies continue to be challenged by finding top shelf candidates for their organizations, recruiters will have to evolve to become engaging and actively interact with the candidate communities they work within.

    *** If this sounds like a horror story for 6 figure candidates, imagine what it is like for those who are below the 6 figure bracket***

    Ljuba

  3. Lynda Margaret

    Your insight and commentary rings so very true, Sharon. It seems that 50% of my $100K+ clients have described similar frustrations.

    I liked Ian’s additional advice, too. And, Ljuba’s least line (in the ***) certainly hit a chord.
    Most of my clients below six figures tell me they don’t even bother with recruiters. Many who tried before report that they have a strong sense the jobs they are targeting are not high enough to be worthy of most recruiters’ time.

Leave a Reply